SF School Facts UK

Multi-academy trust

Yorkshire Collaborative Academy Trust

11 schools across 1 local authority in Yorkshire and the Humber, teaching 1,330 pupils.

The trust at a glance

Schools
11
Primary
11
Secondary
0
Pupils
1,330
Average KS2 expected standard
66%

across its primaries

Across the 9 schools in the trust with comparable results, the average sits about level with the middle of schools with a similar intake. That is a fairer read on the trust than its raw results, which mostly reflect the areas it operates in.

Ofsted across the trust

Outstanding1
Good7
No overall grade3

8 of the trust's 11 schools carry a historic one-word grade; 3 do not. Current report cards grade separate aspects and cannot be reduced to a replacement overall score. A trust that has taken on struggling schools may carry their old grades for years. What changed.

Ofsted outcomes across this trust are mixed: 1 Outstanding, 7 Good; 3 have no overall grade. Historic overall grades and current report cards are different systems and are not averaged.

Schools in Yorkshire Collaborative Academy Trust

SchoolAreaOfstedAttainment 8Progress 8Compare
Askwith Primary SchoolAcademy converter Otley Outstanding 2022
Bradleys Both Community Primary SchoolAcademy converter Keighley Report card 2026
Cononley Primary SchoolAcademy converter Keighley Good 2024
Darley Primary SchoolAcademy converter Harrogate Good 2020
Harrogate, Bilton Grange Primary SchoolAcademy converter Harrogate Good 2023
Hawes Primary SchoolAcademy sponsor led Hawes No overall grade
Leyburn Primary SchoolAcademy converter Leyburn Good 2022
Lothersdale Primary SchoolAcademy converter Keighley No overall grade
Osmotherley Primary SchoolAcademy converter Northallerton Good 2023
Summerbridge Primary SchoolAcademy converter Harrogate Good 2022
Threshfield Primary SchoolAcademy converter Skipton Good 2023

Identity snapshot: 23 August 2026. School membership, pupil totals and trust names come from the dated Get Information About Schools importer build. Results and inspection fields retain their own published periods and should not be treated as if they were measured on that date.